Schopenhauer’s solution to the problem of “will” basically lay in methods to kill the “will” in oneself, whereas Nietzsche’s solution was to strengthen the “will” in oneself to such an extent that one becomes a superior being of willing, an concept that he termed “Ubermensch”, which translates into “Overman” in English, becoming the equivalent of a Superman. Basically, they saw the basic problem the same way, but their solutions to it were very different. The INTJ philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche’s influence by INFJ philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer’s concept of “will” is an excellent example of this phenomenon. INTJs have the power to understand INFJs second-to-none, yet INTJs face outward towards the world with more of an eye towards objective considerations. INFJs have a lot less power to organize and arrange their ideas in an objective form. They basically give them more objective power. Often, INTJs take INFJ impulses and ideas and elaborate on them. You can see it in Arthur Schopenhauer’s influence on Friedrich Nietzsche, Bob Dylan’s influence on John Lennon, and Peter Gabriel’s influence on Kate Bush, to give a few examples. In well-known people you will often see a symbiosis between the INFJ and INTJ. This is roughly the difference between power and adaptability. INFJ has an extraverted Feeling personality and INTJ has an extraverted Thinking personality. Their temperaments are the same, that being introverted intuition as I said.

What I mean by personality is how they show forth the traits of their temperaments. The most evident way this is manifested is in the personalities of the two types. Basically the primary difference comes down to Thinking vs. But, how the two types externalize their introverted intuitive perceptions is vastly different. Both INTJs and INFJs are introverted intuitive types.

Are intjs more machiavellian